Majorityrights Central > Category: White Nationalism

The DNA Nations - 2020 Update

A reading through of this update of a preliminary document of the DNA Nations concept to provide the basic specificatory structure to follow up for those who care for the curation of our diverse kinds of people. While our focus is on European peoples, curation for the preservation of our kinds - genus, species - and potential coordination on the basis of genetics, the concept does not preclude negotiating with mixed kinds, does not prescribe violence, exploitation in any way shape or form and does not preclude non-Europeans from curating their kinds for preservation and working out the means for their coordination with European kinds as well

The DNA Nations - 2020 Update

An implicit union of unions and coalitions thereof based on DNA criteria.

Euro-DNA Nations

James Bowery’s “Laboratory of the States” platform proposes sovereignty through free choice, as people may “vote with their feet” to establish human ecologies through controlled experimentation. The control would be established through freedom from association—that is, the freedom to not associate with others. However, under the current circumstances, efforts to instantiate these deliberately organized “human ecologies” are best conducted in an implicit manner. Indeed, under the circumstances, they must be largely implicit (for example, regarding laws which prohibit realtors from mentioning race to buyers or sellers). Bowery suggests promoting abstract terms such as “our valuation of freedom of choice”. Later, the communities should be able to enforce explicit freedom of and from association.

This freedom from association is corollary to individual freedom of choice and association. Rather than trying to overthrow the the liberal zeitgeist of our epoch, Bowery maintains that we ought to hold liberals to their principles. We will respect and grant their valuation of freedom to go/and or be associated with whom they like and we as European peoples expect the same freedom of choice to go/ and or associate with whom we like.

As far as European Americans and other European diaspora go, Bowery has, since his initial proposal for the laboratory of the states platform, concluded that rather than state-sized units, county-sized political units are more optimal—the sheriff and county being the most viable and manageable scale of organization in defense against the nation-state apparatus in its death throes.

I would argue that the initial state is rather a step toward unionization – a virtual and rules based association, though not made formal as a political action group to begin, just an informal union of unions based on voluntary DNA groupings.
 
Furthermore, Bowery argues that strong valuation of freedom of choice is a distinctly Western characteristic and therefore precious. I concur. He elaborates farther that it is imperative to maintain the unique human ecologies that evolved with this Western characteristic of individual freedom of choice. I concur as well.

This freely and deliberately chosen state/county human ecology is very different from the deeply situated, naturally evolving human ecologies of Europe and Russia, where our people have evolved over tens of thousands of years in relation to particular habitats. It is surely critical for us to maintain these ecologies as well. We would not want to be without either the freely chosen state/county-sized ecologies of European diaspora derived by choice within a lifespan, nor without the truly deep, historical ecologies of our European and Russian nations. These are both goods that we would want to maintain, and yet they are very different concerns. This focuses WN on the task of coordination.

We wouldn’t really want to give up either, but how to coordinate these two goods? This is where a Euro-DNA-based nation begins to look like a potential means of coordination, allowing for various expressions of our native Europeans while never losing sight of their essence.

There is a third crucial matter to coordinate. If a nation of European descended peoples is to have an economy big enough to fund a space program and other large projects, it is likely to need a size larger than the average state (let alone county) to provide for a sufficient economy; and if, as Conner adds, nations of European peoples are to hold up to the growing power of China, they will need to be large.

Thesis: The Indigenous Euro-DNA Nation would provide a means for coordinating smaller States/Counties, both freely chosen human ecologies and those of deep, historical evolution, while providing the means for pursuing a mutual larger manifestation as well.
Given the anti-White hegemony that European peoples are up against from above, along with the turmoil and throngs of anti-Whites that they are up against on all fronts, an endogenous approach is the most practical for the coordination of European peoples sovereignty.

By endogenous here, we mean from the inside out. That is, in proposing autonomous, sovereign nations of European peoples, we should begin with those who would like to be a part of it first—begin by focusing on what we can do as opposed to what we cannot do. It is endogenous also in that the nation is corporeal, literally of the people—their native European DNA being the prime criterion for inclusion. That would be in contrast, though not in opposition, to other WN nation building efforts using an exogenous (from the outside-in) approach, such as the Northwest Front.

There are clear practical advantages of a native Euro-DNA Nation that begins as a formal declaration of a wish as confirmed by voluntary signatories. Firstly, signing-up would only mean that one is expressing a wish to be a part of sovereignty for European peoples. It does not require relinquishing one’s current citizenship.

Nor does it mean antagonizing non-Europeans. We may extend the DNA Nation concept and its freedom of association to them as well. But just as the conscientious are concerned for the preservation of genus and species, pervasive ecology, so too is it perfectly legitimate to look after our European kind.

For whom it may concern, the indigenous Euro-DNA Nation focuses from the start on our most precious concern, our DNA, while not encumbering us with present obstacles to land-situated nations. The Euro-DNA Nation would be non-situated in the beginning (and to some extent always).

However, DNA without land, without habitat indefinitely, would be problematic for a number of reasons. Therefore, it must be an objective of the Euro-DNA Nation to establish sacrosanct Euro-DNA Nation “lands” eventually; the plurality of lands is a deliberate usage. In fact, more safety and resources would be provided if these lands are non-contiguous and disbursed throughout the world. Naturally, WN would seek to re-establish our traditional territories as European, particularly those in Europe, but would also seek to secure sovereign territory in North America, South America, Russia, Australia and New Zealand. Nevertheless, in not being strictly contingent on obtaining land, the nation is rendered more flexible and more practical so that it can start with land claims of any size, even small claims.

Once coordinated as such, its ultimate viability may strive to cover the largest land-masses possible. Thinking about these issues first as a means of coordination with Bowery’s “Laboratory of the States” platform, and in line with that, the DNA Nation being freely chosen would allow people to select various native European sub-categories (if they match), some distinct, some perhaps blended in various ways and degrees. Considering the problem secondly in terms of how to coordinate WN of in its largest possible size, it also provides a highly practical means to instantiate a goal for protracted expanse, as it is highly flexible in its ability to cover territory.

The DNA Nation is also practical in that it does not require unnecessary risk and engagement on the part of participants. Signing-up does not render one complicit with illegal activity of any kind. It only means an expressed wish for sovereignty from non-native European coercion, and to be with persons of indigenous European extraction.

Separatism is a first step, Separatism is the ultimate aim, and Separatism is always possible.

If you wish to express a wish that you might one day be a part of this union of unions that is the Euro-DNA Nation, you may sign up; and specify particular category/union as you wish. DNA proof will ultimately be required for consideration of membership.

The Native European-DNA Nation sign-up along with its subcategories will be provided.

Note 1: The freedom of and from association promoted by the Laboratory of The States/Counties is conceived by Bowery to be an implicit choice. In his estimation, explicit Whiteness does not work. Taking the example of the draconian legal constraints placed on American realtors regarding the mere mention of race to buyers or sellers provides a salient example of how hazardous explicitness can be. However, the explicitness of the DNA registry does not contradict the implicitness strategy due to its being voluntary and not representing a legal status, but rather an expression of a wish. Discretion is nonetheless advised.

Daniel Sienkiewicz

READ MORE...

David Lane’s famous formulation of the nationalist purpose is, though a very adequate imperative, not actually political.  Our people should have a secure existence.  Our children should have a secure future.  In the sense that these are necessities of racial life they do not constitute more than a statement of the obvious and a claim on Nature, though, of course, in a European age as grotesquely internationalist and anti-Natural as ours, they are also a bit of a shock to the liberal moral sensibility.

Still, the question is left hanging: what final politics, what system of ideas, what permanent political purpose do you, dear reader, want?  I mean, beyond the securing of our people’s existence and our children’s future.  Are you truly political in that sense?  Do you, for example, want a return to the Christian life?  That would qualify as an answer of sorts.  Do you want something along the lines of Bowden’s “life of glory”?  Or something else entirely?

If your political ambition does not end with the fourteen words - in essence, if you are not a Western liberal albeit with normal, non-Judaised racial instincts - I’d be interested to know what life you want our people to lead in the sunlit future.

by Leon Haller

A purpose of sites like MR is, or ought to be, the sharing of practical strategies to advance white EGI. Methods of dispute resolution in a White Republic, the ‘unencumbered self’ and its relation to race-liberalism or postmodernity, the existence of God, etc, are all interesting matters. But discussing them hardly directly aids our cause.

Our primary task remains, as ever over the last half-century, mass racial awakening. Too few of our racial kinsmen are even aware that an intellectually respectable (or indeed any respectable) movement in opposition to white extinction exists and is growing. We must let them know we are out there - and each of us must do so again and again and again ...

Repetition of one’s core message is the heart of mass ideological change.

Rather than having to bother with thinking up a new comment for each article we might read online, wouldn’t it be smarter to have something pro-white already prepared, and then simply paste it into the comments sections of literally as many race-relevant (or even just political) articles as we encounter? Copy/paste, login, hit ‘Post’ - et voila! It is certainly easier than laboriously writing or spraying pro-white graffiti (not that that isn’t important, too).

I started writing a comment on a Yahoo board earlier today (I have posted thousands of pro-white comments in mainstream places over the past dozen years), and ended up producing something longer than I had anticipated. My comment, which responded to an article on current political divisiveness, is hardly ideal (esp insofar as it was written quickly and ‘straight’, with no reflection), but re-reading it it seemed adequate for Americans to use to further the awakening process. Of course, I welcome the suggestions of others (perhaps MR could eventually have a file of repeatable comments for mass distribution depending on the article types at issue - American, UK, continental Europe, crime, general race, race science, immigration, etc). The point is for people to be ‘proselytizing’ to the very maximum extent. I don’t wish to belittle the discussions at MR or similar sites, but isn’t the ultimate purpose of those discussions to change the real world?

Herewith a comment from me:

READ MORE...

I am informed by Drew Fraser that Tom Sunic has interviewed him for VoR.  The link to the first part of the interview is here.  This should be an interesting encounter.  There is some similarity in their backgrounds, but Drew is a much more legalistic and establishmentarian thinker than Tom, and a committed Christian.  He gives a good interview, too.

Tom Sunic interviews Soren here.  Run-time 35min 28sec.

Tom gets Soren to expand, somewhat, on his adoption of the Gramscian dictum “pessimism of the intellect - optimism of the will”, on religion in our present woes, on the concept of the enemy, and on civilisational collapse.  Probably the best interview Soren has given.  Still some dark areas for me, but much to think about.

Does anyone know if a concerted effort is being mounted to plant Bob’s mantra across the MSM?  I happened to encounter a lot of it on this Telegraph thread about the short-lived racial segregation at Bjerke Upper Secondary School in Oslo.  Then at BDF I came across this quite powerful video, which is the work of a mantra-phile.

Anyone know anything about this?

And here’s another one:

Quite a few references to “the professional” Bob Whittaker, which I found superfluous but a target audience might not, I suppose.

CC asked an interesting question on the elitism thread:

If you had Regnery’s fortune at your disposal, what precisely would you personally do with it?

To some extent I answered this in the post to that thread when I listed the kinds of bodies which White Nationalism is capable of bringing forward, and which would have a direct impact on public discourse and white political awareness.  But let’s play the game and select the first of these goodies out of the bag, because there is a logical sequence to them and the first ought, if it’s done right, to lead to the second.  And so on.

So ...

A cool August night in black-blitzed, boarded-up Tottenham.  I lay myself down to doze in my louse-infested, single room garret.  A twice-used tea bag and a cracked shaving mirror await me in the morning, followed by a day up west searching for an open handbag, a jacket carelessly thrown over the shoulder.  The loan shark has my benefit book.  The electricity company’s piggy-bank is already empty.  These are thin times for an investment banker, you see.  The crack whore in the room above is hard at work.  Down in the street a white paramedic is tending to the loser in another misunderstanding about “respect”.  Sleep comes slowly.  But it comes because no one can bear indefinite witness to this dystopia.

Morning.  Light streams in, softened and made golden by the fabulous gauze of the silk curtains and sent out again by the brilliant white of the bedsheets to sparkle in the white and gold of a wall-covering also of silk, also fabulous, and several pieces of preposterous 18th century French furniture.  Oh, this isn’t right.  Still dreaming.  I chase away the sleep.  The lousiness of a low London life does not re-materialise.  That moment of dizzy self-doubt.  What is happening ... is this reality or something else?  The bed is as big and soft-sprung as a Cadillac, and the bedroom could house half a tennis court. It might be real.  It seems real.  But it can’t be.

I am on my feet.  They disappear deep into a sea of wool.  Some fancy lettering floats in the middle of it.  “WR II”, four-feet across. Tottenham is definitely not beyond the casements.  I am lost.  A door three yards high and framed with carvings beckons me into a dressing room. More carved wood, more French furniture ... a vast mirror.  Shit, this poor London boy thinks, peering in.  I’ve seen that face before.  That’s Bill fucking Regnery.

READ MORE...

The large number of intelligent, well-informed activists of 8 and 10 years ago who were enthusiastically engaged in a variety of preferred forms of activism appear to have closed shop, as I did, when Kevin MacDonald - most honorable star whose writings I was the first to distribute all over the Internet in 1997- and his super-secret CMS group–imposed a “top-down” template that made “creating a new elite” the Goal ... and themselves the Chosen Elite. The need for this “elite” to self-segregate is due to its members’ “higher level of sophistication”, as a well-known Nordicist put it.

… I stopped posting when I learned of the existence of the group upstairs - they could see us, but we couldn’t see them - they were too important to interact with anyone but each other. Apparently our function was to provide fodder for our betters to use in their writings; other than that, we should go off and form groups on our own. MacDonald’s list still exists, but of its 178 subscribers, only half a dozen post; that’s been the case for years. In 2002, CMS had less than 50 members; today it has twice as many. I know from insiders that if a member divulges a word about what they speak of, how many or who they are, anything about them, they’ll be removed. That would, of course, be worse than death. Last year, in my second (and last) brief email exchange with Greg Johnson, I happened to comment, “I support Kevin MacDonald, but not CMS.”  Like a scalded cat, Greg replies, “How do you know about them; it’s supposed to be secret!” - the next day his first article was published there; God forbid that people should not realize he’s an insider.

Any group of people has the right to set themselves up as a secret group and declare itself “elite.” And a lot of people, maybe most, have no problem with hierarchy - across the ocean Jonathan B and Troy S seem to favor it, too. Tom Sunic now refers to “my colleagues” in his broadcast and his new website is invitation-only. A few years ago, Ted Sallis did the same - a great loss to those on the outside who had been learning so much from his writings.

These statements are drawn from two comments on the Hunter thread by the redoubtable and true-hearted lady who comments as MOB.  The charge of elitism for its own sake is a serious one because it implies the relegation of the bond of blood to something worryingly like ... elitism.  It cannot be over-stated that the authenticity and legitimacy of leadership in a nationalist movement rests solely on that leadership’s blood ties to the people, with all that that implies for loyalty and purpose.  Having the smarts to be interested in complex analyses of White America’s political and demographic crisis is not enough.

Five hours after MOB made her second comment another redoubtable figure, Yggdrasil, turned up – for the first time ever on any MR thread as far as I am aware.  CMS, he said, is not a secret organisation but a confidential one.  No elitism or snobbery is implied.  The confidentiality simply serves to protect those involved, or who would be asked to become involved, against persecution and loss of livelihood.  Additionally, Ygg explained, confidentiality protects against (a) government agent penetration, (b) the kook tendency, and (c) the ego factor.

Well, if there is a difference between secrecy and confidentiality, I don’t know what it is.  Obviously, it doesn’t protect against government snooping.  Nothing does.  The best policy, actually, is openness - and pseudonyms where people wish.  As far as not inviting kooks and egotists to participate, fine.  Just don’t invite them.  No need to hide from them.  The hiding makes CMS look, if not elitist, at least putatively masonic.  My guess is that some of those involved also think, if only privately, that they have joined the “elite”.  Why not?  They have joined something, that’s clear - Ygg used the word “membership”.  But membership of what, exactly?  It’s confidential.  And with whom?  Confidential.  For what purpose?  Confidential.

There is something not right here.  I can’t put my finger on it, but it’s there – despite the wide-eyed denials.

I am minded of the Atlanta conference in late-2008 or early 2009, I forget now.  That, too, was confidential.  But when non-invitees enquired as to who was there and what was discussed, the only response was a terse “nothing of substance was proposed at Atlanta”.  Difficult to believe that was true.  I mean, what would be the point of dozens of “elite” American nationalists convening in Atlanta to arrive at a null conclusion?  That would be a huge failure.  Was it a coincidence, then,  when the formation of A3P was announced in January 2010?  Because if not … if Atlanta wasn’t, in fact, a failure ... if a political party was discussed, even in outline with a call for further research or a decision later, when more facts are known ... if that was the case, CMS is guilty not only of “confidentiality” but of lying.

Why?  Did A3P risk a still birth if a little frankness had prevailed?  Are we to believe that “government agents”, “kooks” and “egotists” would have leapt upon the nascent creature and torn it limb from limb?

Well, let’s bust the game open and note now that there are, in fact, only a limited number of nascent creatures White Nationalism can generate to shift the movement from on-line activity to full spectrum political activism.  These are:

a) A political party – A3P looks to be a pretty reasonable beginning.

b) A funding agency seeking long-term relationships with significant doners.

c) A national cultural organisation to reach out and connect to existing “implicitly white” cultural bodies and events.

d) A think tank generating analysis and policy solutions, tasked with informing not only the politics of the movement but the wider political and media sphere (this is not the National Policy Institute, which, sadly, resembles a standard on-line propaganda site no different to Amren).

e) An anti-defamation body – a template exists in ResistingDefamation.org.

f) A media and PR arm tasked with facilitating relations with journalists and opinion formers.  Yes, difficult but necessary.

And perhaps ...

g) A networking arm drawn from all units and, possibly, significant figures without the movement, the aim of which is to measure the performance of the movement and manage it consonant with its historical objective.

That, more or less, is what the secretive folks of CMS can actually discuss.  The political party excepted, they’ve only got to look at how Jewry goes about the task.  The template for success is right there.  They could also borrow some of that Jewish solidarity with and respect for their own people.  Practise what you preach.